Most university application essays or supplements present at least the possibility of writing about books. Several applications ask directly that you write about a book or a series of books. If that sounds like you, read on, after you have a look at my last post which opens up the conversation which I will continue below. After you have one or more drafts ready, send them to me at email@example.com; I will return a sample edit to you and a bid for the job. You get a risk-free sample of what I can do for you; in return I ask for only serious inquiries. Thanks and enjoy.
For most application prompts which you can or should use books to address, it is either required or advisable to write about more than one book, and it is also wise to refer to or use at least some books which aren’t part of the national high school or junior college curriculum. You do not want to establish yourself as a person who simply does The Required Reading. Our universities are not simple technical schools; they represent what is called the liberal tradition of education, which is rooted in a humanistic vision of the world. If that isn’t making sense, they are looking for the closest thing possible to a Renaissance woman–or man–to admit to their schools. They want you to have an active curiosity and to be reading about matters that aren’t necessarily part of a class. They want you to desire learning for its own sake.
Perhaps you don’t. Perhaps you feel a tad guilty, but the real deal from your point of view is to get into college to make money. Fair enough, but in writing this essay, you might just find that buried spark of curiosity and, if not, you can fake intellectual curiosity. If you fake it long enough, it will become real.
But on to the books themselves, and to writing about them. One immediate mistake is to assume that this essay can only be about a particular kind of book, such as the novel or the biography. Nay, my friends! In fact, I encourage you to consider how different books which you have read because you wanted to might be compared. You may, in fact, be able to use a book (or two) which you had to read for school but which you also like or love, and relate it to other books you have read outside of school.
I presume that you have read my last post and hopefully clicked the link there to the New York Review of Books and did some reading. Nobody expects you to write at that level of depth, which of course is not possible given the length requirements of the apps, but the idea and basic structural elements of the NYRB give you a good model.
The way to go about this is to establish some point of comparison between the books beyond the fact that you read them. This most often occurs to writers as they survey the material and ask themselves how to tie the disparate material together.
Or you could approach a selection of books with a preexisting assumption or overarching argument and ascertain which of them could be used in relation to your argument.
Here is an example of such an assumption: We Live in the Age of Unintended Consequences. I know, I know: all the ages of man are ages of unintended consequences. Yet in making this statement, you would be suggesting that this is the hallmark of our age above all others, and that this is clear in everything from financial markets to looming environmental catastrophe to wars and interventions which breed only more wars and interventions. As an arguable point which you will use your readings to demonstrate, such a broad thematic statement is just fine. Not only that, this rather classic theme of literature and history is widely applicable. Ask yourself what you have read that in some way reflects the truth contained by the thesis that We Live in the Age of Unintended Consequences. I would argue that most books deal with this in some way.
Most books on the common Required Reading lists qualify. The Great Gatsby, check. It’s not like Jay is floating around waiting to be shot. Grapes of Wrath? With an interpretive slant, check (picture an army of radicalized Tom Joads ghosting through the land, intent on overthrowing the Powers That Be who, in the end, created him themselves, or created his righteous anger, which comes to the same thing). Romeo and Juliet, Of Mice and Men, Beowulf, check, check and check. As for your history textbooks, check on pretty much every event. Not that you want to write about your high school history textbooks, though if your teacher happened to use a wonderful stand-alone, such as Timothy Egan’s The Worst Hard Time (speaking of Tom Joad) or Egan’s other great book on 20th Century America, The Big Burn, or Tom Holland’s Rubicon, a wonderful survey of Rome at the end of the Republic, well, you should definitely avail yourself of their contents for your essay.
Once you establish a broad theme, the next step is how to conceptualize it, how to create a heirarchy and definitions. What do I mean? If we are looking at unintended consequences as our basic claim, we can define our own boundaries. Perhaps we use the term Modernity to focus what we mean by the Age of Unintended Consequences; in other words, we may be claiming that The Modern Age is an Age of Unintended Consequences. Now we’ll have to explain further, and as we do, conceptualize and define in such a way that we establish the structural principles for the essay. If this seems like a lot of work, I would point out that this might become the introduction to your essay.
In the spirit of showing rather than telling, an introduction to an essay about books based on the premise outlined above might look something like this:
“If I were to draw a single conclusion from all of the reading I have done in my free time, it is this: that the Modern Age is an Age of Unintended Consequences. I read widely, in many different genres. I have found that in all genres, from popular novels such as the the science fiction trilogy The Hunger Games, to contemporary histories on our recent wars, such as Dexter Filkins’ account of the War on Terror in The Forever War, to the clutch of books recounting the roots and consequences of our financial crisis, like Michael Lewis’ Big Short or his more recent Boomerang, our historians, journalists and novelists are preoccupied with our own failure to foresee the consequences of our actions.”
You would then go on to discuss these works in whatever structure suits you–you might work through them one at a time, with each book composing a subtopic of your essay, or you might discuss similar elements or themes in each, with the themes being subtopics. You could create a very convincing essay using only three “nonrequired” works like those I use in my example, but any good selection of books which you tie together clearly and convincingly will do.
Notice how you can bend a broad idea like the one I discuss above, reshaping and redefining it so that it fits a set of books; you can expand or contract the era you want to discuss; you can pick parts of works to highlight while downplaying or ignoring other parts; you can compare science fiction to contemporary history to biography. You just need to establish the right categories and conceptual framework in your introduction.
Start by listing some “big ideas’ which might link a group of books, allowing what seems disparate to be comparable; then list books you have read and liked according to these ideas–look for common ground and make lists of books which have common ideas, problems, themes, outcomes, what have you. At this point, you are on your way.
In the near future, I will be writing posts on both how to conclude an essay and on the Five Paragraph Essay which is so favored on high school campuses and so hated on college campuses. In the meantime, Good Luck and Godspeed, and don’t forget, I offer editing services–though you’ll have to hurry if you want to use them. My calendar is filling rapidly as the deadlines approach, so you need to contact me soon if you wish to use my services. See my introductory post and the About section of this blog for my contact information.
My blog is searchable and will show up on sites like turnitin.com as well as on the similar programs used by many universities to spot plagiarists. Your essays should reflect original thought; while I believe that, if you tweak the idea I presented here to suit yourself, you are doing original thinking, you do need to rework the idea for yourself and write the essay using books you know well. Better yet, come up with a different idea about our times and learn from my presentation of how to approach the conceptual challenge without using my idea at all. Remember: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery but copying is plagiarism.